New condo lending rules could soon change how many condominium associations build their annual budgets.
New condo lending rules could soon change how many condominium associations build their annual budgets.
As lenders take a closer look at reserve funding, boards may need to raise dues, update reserve plans, and provide better records so buyers can qualify for conventional loans.
Fannie Mae announced that, under its Full Review process, the minimum reserve allocation will rise from 10% to 15% of annual budgeted assessment income. Lenders must apply the new minimum to loan applications dated on or after January 4, 2027.
In simple terms, a larger share of the association’s planned assessment income must be directed toward reserves. These funds are meant for capital work and deferred maintenance, such as roof replacement, concrete repair, elevator work, paving, and major mechanical systems.

A lender evaluating a condo purchase looks beyond the borrower’s credit, income, and down payment. It also reviews the financial and physical condition of the condominium project. That is because every unit owner shares responsibility for common property.
If a building has weak reserves, one major failure can lead to a large special assessment. Owners who cannot pay may fall behind, repairs may be delayed, and unit values may suffer. These risks can affect the property that secures the mortgage.
Fannie Mae explains that condo project standards are meant to address poor financial health, unresolved critical repairs, and inadequate insurance. If a project does not meet the applicable requirements, a loan on a unit in that project may not be eligible for sale to Fannie Mae until the problem has been resolved.
Most associations receive nearly all their income through regular owner assessments. When the required reserve allocation rises, the board must find room in a budget that may already be strained by insurance, utilities, labor, landscaping, security, and vendor costs.
Assume a condominium collects $600,000 a year in regular assessments. A 10% allocation would place $60,000 into reserves, while a 15% allocation would place $90,000 into reserves. The association would need to find another $30,000 each year.
If no operating expenses can be reduced, that gap must usually come from owners. In a 100-unit community, an even allocation would equal $300 per unit per year, or $25 per month. Actual increases will vary because many associations divide assessments by ownership share, unit size, or another formula in the governing documents.

Condo boards should not treat higher dues as the only possible response. The better approach is to examine the full budget, confirm the project’s needs, and then choose a funding plan that is both lawful and realistic.
Common budget responses may include:
Each option has a different effect on owners and the association. Before approving a plan, boards should consult their manager, reserve professional, accountant, and association attorney as needed.
Some boards prefer a special assessment because it avoids a visible increase in monthly dues. That choice may work for a defined repair, but it is not a complete answer to an ongoing reserve funding requirement.
Fannie Mae’s published project guidance has stated that special assessments cannot be used in place of the required budget reserve allocation during a Full Review. Freddie Mac also states that special assessments do not replace the required reserve contribution under the review types covered by its guidance.
Special assessments can also make ownership less predictable. An owner may be able to handle an extra $25 each month but struggle with a demand for several thousand dollars at once. A pending assessment can further complicate a sale when buyers and lenders ask who will pay it and whether the related work is complete.

A reserve study reviews the association’s major common components, their expected useful lives, and the likely cost of future repair or replacement. It then recommends a funding plan based on the community’s current reserve balance and expected expenses.
Under Fannie Mae’s enhanced rules, when a reserve study is used to show adequate funding, the budget must include the study’s highest recommended reserve allocation. The baseline method, which lets the reserve balance approach zero without dropping below it, will no longer qualify for this purpose.
This point matters because 15% is not a universal measure of reserve health. A newer, simple property may need less capital work than an older high-rise with elevators, balconies, a parking structure, and aging pipes. Boards should rely on property-specific data instead of treating the lender minimum as the final funding goal.
A buyer may have strong credit and enough cash to close, yet still face a loan problem because of the condo association. During underwriting, the lender may request the budget, financial statements, insurance records, questionnaires, inspection reports, details about special assessments, and information about deferred maintenance.
If the project does not meet Fannie Mae’s standards, the lender may be unable to deliver the loan to Fannie Mae. That can narrow the buyer’s financing choices. Another lender may reach the same result if it plans to sell the mortgage through the same channel.
The buyer might need to consider a portfolio loan, a larger down payment, or another financing product. Such options may carry different rates, fees, or approval terms, and they may not be available to every applicant.

The effects do not stop with new buyers. Current owners may see higher regular assessments as the board moves more money into reserves. Those planning to refinance may also face a project review, depending on the loan and review path.
Owners who want to sell could encounter a smaller buyer pool if the project has unresolved eligibility concerns. A financing delay can extend the closing period, trigger more document requests, or cause a buyer to withdraw if an affordable alternative loan cannot be found.
There is a positive side. Better-funded reserves can reduce the risk of sudden, large bills and help the association complete needed work on time. A stable budget and clear maintenance plan can also make the community easier for buyers and lenders to evaluate.
Reserve funding is only one part of condo project eligibility. Lenders may also review the condition of the property, insurance coverage, litigation, ownership structure, delinquency levels, commercial space, and other project details.
Common warning signs include:
Freddie Mac states that if a lender cannot obtain required inspection information or enough details to make an eligibility decision, the mortgage may not qualify for delivery. Good records therefore matter almost as much as good planning.

Boards do not need to wait for a sale to uncover a reserve or document problem. Early review gives the association more time to correct its budget, explain changes to owners, and prepare a complete response for lender questionnaires.
Boards can begin with these steps:
A management company can help coordinate these tasks, but the board remains responsible for its decisions. Legal and financial professionals should review issues that fall within their fields.
Owners may resist an increase if they see only the new monthly figure. A clear notice should connect the amount to the association’s actual needs and explain how the budget supports future repairs and condo financing.
The board should show the prior reserve contribution, the proposed contribution, and the dollar impact per unit. It should also identify the projects covered by the reserve plan. Specific facts are easier to understand than a general statement that costs have increased.
It is also wise to explain what the increase does not guarantee. Meeting a reserve allocation threshold does not automatically approve every loan or cure unrelated problems, such as critical repairs or insufficient insurance. It simply strengthens one important part of the project’s financial profile.
Delaying a needed increase may feel like relief, especially when household budgets are tight. Yet construction costs can rise while an aging roof, plumbing system, or garage continues to decline. The eventual repair may cost more, and the association will have less time to collect the money.
Late action can also place owners in a difficult spot during a sale. If a lender finds a weak budget or an unresolved repair after the contract is signed, the parties may have only a few weeks to seek documents, correct errors, or find another loan. An association cannot rebuild its reserves overnight.
Steady contributions are often easier to manage than a sudden financial demand. They also spread the cost of shared assets among the owners who use them over time, rather than leaving a small group to pay a large bill in one year.
Buyers can reduce surprises by reviewing the association early and involving their lender before key contract deadlines pass. They should not assume that a preapproval for personal finances means the condo project will qualify.
Useful questions include:
Buyers should discuss the answers with their lender, real estate professional, and attorney. Condo laws and contract rights differ by state, so local guidance is important.
No owner welcomes a higher bill, but keeping dues artificially low can shift today’s costs into tomorrow’s crisis.
When boards fund reserves with care, complete repairs on time, and maintain clear records, they support a safer property and a healthier resale market.
Ready to strengthen your association’s financial future? Explore HOAManagement (.com) directory to get started.
Related Articles:
Sign up below for monthly updates on all HOA Resource